【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2893次   下载 443 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
约翰·莱尔的人文生态智慧:中西融合的人文生态系统设计思想
王云才, 罗雨雁
同济大学
摘要:
中国传统道家生态智慧从哲学层面建立了人地关系的至高至善的标准,对从根源指导生态规划设计具有重要价值。在西方科学理性和技术理性的背景下,约翰·莱尔提出了“道家方式是人文生态系统设计的正确方式”的观点,并认为伊恩·麦克哈格设计的伍德兰兹社区正是西方人充分借鉴吸收道家智慧和道家方式的集中体现。从土地利用与空间布局、自然排水系统、调蓄机制和后期管理4部分探讨伍德兰兹社区现代生态适宜性分析技术与传统道家生态思想的契合,并探索道家思想与现代生态规划设计思想的融合的特征与规律,为生态规划设计提供一种具有创造性实践意义的新思路。
关键词:  人文生态系统  道家智慧  约翰·莱尔  伍德兰兹社区  经验启示
DOI:
分类号:TU986
基金项目:国家重点研发计划课题“绿色基础设施生态系统服务功能提升与生态安全格局构建”(编号 2017YFC0505705)
John Lyle’s Human Ecological Wisdom: Thoughts on Integrating the West and East Way of Human Ecosystem Design
WANG Yun-cai, LUO Yu-yan
Tongji University
Abstract:
The traditional Chinese Taoist ecological wisdom has established the highest and the best standard of man-land relationship from the philosophical level and is of great value to guide the ecological planning and design from the root. In the context of Western scientific rationality and technical rationality, John Lyle proposed the idea that “the Taoist approach is the right way of human ecosystems design” and that Ian McHarg’s Woodlands Community in Texas is the epitome of Taoist wisdom and way which westerners can fully learn from and absorb. Probing into the similarities between modern ecological suitability analysis technology of the Woodlands community and Taoist ecological ideas from the aspects of land use and spatial distribution, natural drainage system, regulation-storage mechanism and post-management, and explore the integration characteristics and laws of Taoism and modern ecological planning and design, to provide a new idea with creative and practical significance for ecological planning and design.
Key words:  human ecosystem  Taoist wisdom  John Lyle  the Woodlands community  experience and inspiration
引用本文:王云才,罗雨雁.约翰·莱尔的人文生态智慧:中西融合的人文生态系统设计思想[J].风景园林,2018,25(6):47-51.
WANG Yun-cai,LUO Yu-yan.John Lyle’s Human Ecological Wisdom: Thoughts on Integrating the West and East Way of Human Ecosystem Design[J].Landscape Architecture Journal, 2018, 25(6):47-51.