摘要: |
基于中国市场经济转型与住宅市场急剧分化的背景,城市绿色空间的社会公平问题成为亟待研究的重要议题。选取广州作为案例城市,从人口统计学特征、社会经济地位和社会空间结构这3个维度划分目标人群并进行相关性分析。针对不同社会群体公园可达性的空间格局,采用空间集聚分析评估其相似性和差异性,并利用独立样本检验评判人口特征与公园可达性的相关性,从社会公平的视角揭示城市公园的空间不均衡和社会空间分异之间的关系。研究表明,低收入群体在公园可达性方面并不像预想中的那样处于劣势地位,城市绿色空间规划策略取得了良好的成效。然而低端从业者仍然是公园资源统筹调配过程中的弱势群体,需要给予更多关注。 |
关键词: 风景园林 社会公平 弱势群体 公园可达性 广州市 |
DOI:10.14085/j.fjyl.2020.01.0090.07 |
分类号:TU986 |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号41871140,41930646,41971194 |
|
Study on Urban Park Accessibility in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Social Equity |
HE Ge1, XIAO Yang2, WU Rong3, LIU Ye4
|
1.Nanjing University;2.Tongji University;3.Guangdong University of Technololgy;4.Sun Yat-Sen University
|
Abstract: |
The social equity of urban green space has become an important issue to be studied urgently considering the background of China's market economy transformation and the rapid differentiation of the housing market. This paper cites Guangzhou as a case city to divide the target population and make relevant analysis from three dimensions of demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status and social spatial structure. It applies the spatial clustering analysis to evaluate the similarity and difference between the spatial patterns of park accessibility among different social groups, and adopts the independent sample test to examine the correlation, revealing the connection between urban park spatial imbalance and social spatial differentiation from the perspective of social equity. The result shows that due to the urban green space planning strategies, the groups with low incomes are not inferior in terms of park accessibility. However, the practitioners in low-end occupations are still vulnerable in the process of overall allocation of park resources, which calls for more attention. |
Key words: landscape architecture social equity vulnerable groups park accessibility Guangzhou |
引用本文: | 何格,肖扬,吴蓉,刘晔.社会公平视角下广州市城市公园可达性研究[J].风景园林,2020,27(1):90-96. |
HE Ge,XIAO Yang,WU Rong,LIU Ye.Study on Urban Park Accessibility in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Social Equity[J].Landscape Architecture Journal, 2020, 27(1):90-96. |
|