| 摘要: |
| 第三届联合国住房和城市可持续发展大会（人居三大会）的《新城市议程》为实现可持续发展目标进行了“范式转变”。但是，对“安全、韧性、可持续和包容城市”的新呼吁仍然依赖指标等旧方法论工具、智慧城市等技术管理解决方案和无效的生态现代化范式的体制框架。在这个旧框架内追求新的城市范式只能起到类似免疫的作用：它为公民和环境接种“疫苗”，以便他们将来可以承受更大的不平等和退化风险；它参与解决全球社会—环境不平等问题，但收效甚微。诚然，现在全世界越来越多的社区拒绝接受这些免疫学方法。相反，他们打破了路径依赖性，并建立了获得住房、医疗保健及卫生设施等的有效替代方法。真正的智能解决方案和真正的社会革新不在建立共识的行为中，而在这些持异议的做法中，它是能够反映什么问题才是迫切需要被解决的活指标。 |
| 关键词: 冲突 分歧 人居三大会 包容性 指标 《新城市议程》 政治生态 韧性 安全 智慧城市 社会创新 可持续 可持续发展目标11 |
| DOI：10.14085/j.fjyl.2020.05.0052.07 |
| 分类号:TU984.11+5 |
| 基金项目:欧盟第七研发框架计划“玛丽·居里行动计划”（ENTITLE，编号 289374） |
|
| “Don’t Call Me Resilient Again!”: The UN Habitat New Urban Agenda as Immunology |
|
(GRC) Maria Kaika1, SONG Yan2, CHEN Chongxian3
|
|
1.University of Amsterdam;2.Delft University of Technology;3.South China Agricultural University
|
| Abstract: |
| The Habitat III Conference’s New Urban Agenda hails a “paradigm shift” for pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the new call for “safe, resilient, sustainable and inclusive cities” remains path dependent on old methodological tools (e.g. indicators), techno-managerial solutions (e.g. smart cities), and institutional frameworks of an ecological modernization paradigm that did not work. Pursuing a new urban paradigm within this old framework can only act as immunology: it vaccinates citizens and environments so that they can take larger doses of inequality and degradation in the future; it mediates the effects of global socio-environmental inequality, but does little towards alleviating it. Indeed, an increasing number of communities across the world now decline these immunological offers. Instead, they rupture path dependency and establish effective alternative methods for accessing housing, healthcare, sanitation, etc. I argue that real smart solutions and real social innovation are to be found not in consensus-building exercises, but in these dissensus practices that act as living indicators of what/where urgently needs to be addressed. |
| Key words: conflict dissensus Habitat III inclusiveness indicators New Urban Agenda political ecology resilience safety smart city social innovation sustainability Sustainable Development Goal 11 |
| 引用本文: | （希腊）玛利亚·凯卡,宋岩,陈崇贤.“请别再叫我有韧性”：联合国人居署的《新城市议程》充当免疫角色[J].风景园林，2020，27（5）：52-58. |
| (GRC) Maria Kaika,SONG Yan,CHEN Chongxian.“Don’t Call Me Resilient Again!”: The UN Habitat New Urban Agenda as Immunology[J].Landscape Architecture Journal, 2020, 27(5):52-58. |
|
