| 摘要: |
| 城市绿地与健康的研究现多集中于城市绿地客观保健功能和对既有健康活动需求的满足情况，而城市绿地对于健康促进的完整机制仍待揭示。因此引介健康心理学的健康行为理论为视角，采用“在场”与“缺席”分析思路，重读城市绿地与健康的权威综述，分析得到城市绿地健康行为中3对“动力–阻碍”关系：亲生物性动力与原生阻碍、需求动力与客观阻碍、行为控制信念动力与主观阻碍，其中城市绿地相应角色为存在、支持、吸引，这为城市绿地健康促进机制搭建了新的解读框架。城市绿地与健康的现有议题在此框架下呈现新的分布结构，并指出在亲生物性、可达性与功能性等主流议题之外，城市绿地品质与潜在使用者克服主观阻碍的能力之间的关联也值得深入探讨。 |
| 关键词: 体力活动 自我效能 环境美学 交往空间 可达性 亲生物性 环境感知 |
| DOI：10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.05.0068.07 |
| 分类号:TU986 |
| 基金项目:广东省基础与应用基础研究基金自然科学基金面上项目（编号 2019A1515010483） |
|
| Research on Motivation-Barrier Relationship in the Process of Health Behaviors in Urban Green Space |
|
LI Yue, LIN Guangsi
|
|
South China University of Technology
|
| Abstract: |
| The current studies on the relationship between urban green space and residents’ health largely focus on the objective health care function of the green space and how it meets users’ needs, but the complete mechanism of urban green space in health promotion still needs to be further explained. This research introduces the perspective of health behavior theory and adopts the framework of “presence” and “absence” to analyze the relationship between urban green space and health based on authoritative literature reviews, which establishes a new interpretation framework for the health promotion mechanism of urban green space. Three pairs of motivation-barrier relationships in the process of health behavior in urban green space are obtained: “biophilia and original barrier”, “activity needs and objective barrier”, and “control belief and subjective barrier”. The roles of urban green space are respectively existence, support and attraction. This research further rearranges the distribution structure of the existing issues on the relationship between urban green space and health according to the framework, and argues that in addition to the popular issues under the topic of green space and health, such as biophilia, accessibility and functionality, it is also worth exploring the relationship between urban green space quality and the ability of potential users to overcome subjective barriers. |
| Key words: physical activity self-efficacy environmental aesthetic communication space accessibility biophilia environmental perception |
