| 摘要: |
| 翡翠项链（1878—1880年）是位于波士顿的一个线性公园系统，由弗雷德里克·劳·奥姆斯特德于19世纪设计。如今，重新探讨奥姆斯特德理论是极其重要的，正是由于他的理论，景观在蓝绿空间的多功能系统中作为基础设施得以众所周知。如今，奥姆斯特德理论的运用强调了以边缘景观为基础的绿色基础设施（GI）对多尺度规划与设计方法论的重要性。基于2012年被宣布为欧洲绿色之都的城市——西班牙维多利亚-加斯蒂兹的案例研究，阐释了景观作为基础设施，如何促进绿色基础设施的弹性城市规划与设计。奥姆斯特德理论可以提供一个多尺度策略，以重新审视区域边缘空间。 |
| 关键词: 边缘景观 绿色基础设施 翡翠项链 弗雷德里克·劳·奥姆斯特德 维多利亚 - 加斯蒂兹 |
| DOI：10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.12.0027.09 |
| 分类号:TU986 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Contribution of Blue-Green Space System in Marginal Landscape: A Case Study of the “Emerald and Sapphire Necklace” in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain |
|
(BRA) Camila Gomes Sant’Anna1, LONG Lingege2, LI Mengyixin2
|
|
1.Federal University of Goiás (UFG) in Brazil;2.Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture
|
| Abstract: |
| The Emerald Necklace (1878–1880), a chain of parks in Boston, was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted in the 19th century. Rethinking his theory nowadays is fundamental, as it was from this theory that the landscape as infrastructure became well-known through a multifunctional system of blue-green spaces. Applying the Olmsted’s theory nowadays highlights the importance of multiscale planning and design methodology for green infrastructure (GI), which has the marginal landscape as a base. Having carried out the study to demonstrate how the landscape is understood as infrastructure can contribute to GI resilient city planning and design, based on the case study of the city declared European green capital in 2012, Vitoria-Gasteiz in Spain. The Olmsted’s theory can contribute to defining a multiscale strategy to rethink the margins of the territory. |
| Key words: marginal landscape green infrastructure (GI) Emerald Necklace Frederick Law Olmsted Vitoria-Gasteiz |
| 引用本文: | （巴西）卡米拉·戈梅斯·圣安娜,龙林格格,李梦一欣.边缘景观在蓝绿空间系统中的贡献——以西班牙维多利亚-加斯蒂兹“翡翠与蓝宝石项链”为例[J].风景园林，2022，29（12）：27-35. |
| (BRA) Camila Gomes Sant’Anna,LONG Lingege,LI Mengyixin.Contribution of Blue-Green Space System in Marginal Landscape: A Case Study of the “Emerald and Sapphire Necklace” in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain[J].Landscape Architecture Journal, 2022, 29(12):27-35. |
|
