| 摘要: |
| 本文写作的初始动力来源于现实的问题意识。在过去几十年的风景园林领域内，景观设计与理论的关系始终存在着某种模糊和混乱的状态，在一定程度上，这种境况同时干扰着行业的实践与学术的研究。鉴于此，为了一定程度上回应上述困境，本文假设景观设计与理论之间存在着3种关系：阐释、自治和互设，并且以此33种关系分述每一种关系中相对应的功能、价值和生产机制等内容。本文期待的效应如下：首先，尽可能地避免景观设计与理论之间的错位带来的迷惑。其次，3种关系的界定不仅能够通过特定的理论形式激发特定设计实践的创造力，还可以进一步促进风景园林的智识性探索。最后，在设计与理论的思辨框架中，甚至能够进一步促进和发展精细化、具体化和导向性的设计批评。 |
| 关键词: 风景园林 景观设计 理论 阐释 自治 互设 设计研究 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:TU986 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Three Relationships amongst Landscape Design and Theory: Interpretation, Self-reference and Mutation |
|
MU Xiao-dong
|
|
Tsinghua University,
|
| Abstract: |
| The primary motivation in this essay stems from the problem consciousness derived from the reality. In the last decades, the relationship has tended to be ambiguous and confusing between landscape design and its theory in the field of landscape architecture. To a certain degree, this condition has disturbed both design practice and academic research. My assumption is that there are three different kinds of relationships between the two: interpretation, self-reference and mutation, on base of which relating function, value, producing mechanism and so on would be introduced in respective categories. Firstly, avoid the confusing situation caused by the misplacement of landscape design and theory as much as possible. Secondly, the definition of the three relationships can not only stimulate the creativity of specific design practices through specific theoretical forms, but also potentially promote the intellectual exploration of landscape architecture. Last but not least, the promotion and development of more elaborated, concrete and oriented design criticism could even be expected in the critical framework of design and theory. |
| Key words: landscape architecture landscape design theory interpretation self-reference mutation design research |
