| 摘要: |
| 发端于英国的LCA和HLC这2套体系日益成为景观特征评估的重要方法和工具。从发展历程、方法步骤及其在不同尺度上的实践与应用等方面比较分析，发现LCA体系在跨国区域、国家尺度上的景观特征类型识别与区划具有明显优势，评估结果能包容更多的景观特征，但公众参与评估的深度和对景观历史维度的关注存在局限；HLC专注于历史景观的特征识别,在地方行政和场地尺度上对景观演变和历史景观特征类型识别优于LCA体系，但评估结果不及后者全面，二者存在互补性。合理借鉴和融合2套体系，进行景观特征类型识别和区划，将有助于指导中国国土景观、乡村景观的合理管护和利用。 |
| 关键词: 风景园林 景观特征评估 历史景观特征识别 方法论 应用 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:TU986 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金（编号 51678269）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（编号 2662016PY036） |
|
| Comparative Study of Landscape Character Assessment and Historic Landscape Characterisation and Its Inspiration to China |
|
WANG Lun, ZHANG Bin*
|
|
Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture
|
| Abstract: |
| Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) and Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) originated in the United Kingdom, which are increasingly becoming important methods and tools for landscape character assessment. This article has carried on the comparative analysis from the aspects of the course of development, the method steps and its application and practice in different scales. LCA system has obvious advantages in the identification and division of landscape character types in transnational region and country scale, assessment results can accommodate more landscape features, however, there are limitations on the depth of public participation and the attention of historical dimension of landscape. HLC focuses on the character identification of historic landscape, the landscape evolution and identification of historical landscape character type in local authority and local scale are better than LCA system, but compared with LCA, the assessment results are not comprehensive, there is complementarity between the two systems. Rationally drawing on and integrating two systems and carrying out the identification and division of landscape character types will help to guide the reasonable management and utilization of territory and rural landscape in our country. |
| Key words: landscape architecture landscape character assessment character identification of historic landscape methodology application |
