| 摘要: |
| 基于城市设计永恒性思考的设计研究，对比分析美国密歇根州底特律市和中国武汉市历史演进中的形态学研究成果。2项研究所使用的研究工具均来源于代尔夫特形态学方法，该方法旨在以减构制图简化地图数据，提取空间形态结构，界定城市未来发展所依托的结构性要素，从而既可实现城市的历史连续性，又可保持地方特性。图析过程采用倒溯分析的方式，以当代地图为基底，并按照时间线回溯、绘制不同历史时期的分析图。这是因为相较于历史地图，当代地图的制图方法与投射技术能够更加精准地反映真实情况。底特律的城市肌理几乎填满城市的网格，网格本身可以被看成经过减构的结构性空间要素，对地图数据相对较低程度的抽象就足以揭示其城市空间结构，而网格以外的其他空间要素则可被看成不同时期形成的城市的其他结构性要素；而武汉的城市形态更为复杂，需要更高程度的抽象以提取城市空间结构，在减构过程中使用形态同质区和二级结构关联分析工具。研究旨在展示在同一方法框架下，当2座城市的物质空间特质不同时，需采用不同的研究工具，进而发展出不同的研究结果。 |
| 关键词: 图析 代尔夫特形态学方法 底特律 武汉 减构制图 形态同质区 二级结构关联 |
| DOI：10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.11.0049.10 |
| 分类号:TU984.3/7 |
| 基金项目:广东省教育规划课题高等教育专项（编号 2022GXJK093）；新引进高端人才财政补助科研启动项目（编号 FB11409009）；深圳市高等院校稳定支持面上项目（编号 20200812115436001）；广东省哲学社会科学规划学科共建项目（编号 GD22XYS27） |
|
| Mapping Detroit and Wuhan |
|
(NLD) Henco Bekkering1, CAI Jiaxiu2, WANG Shuo2
|
|
1.Delft University of Technology;2.Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen
|
| Abstract: |
| The paper compares the research outcomes of the historical morphological analyses of Detroit, Michigan in the United States of America and Wuhan in the People’s Republic of China, done by the first author and his teams. The two research projects are rooted in thinking about permanence in urban design. The Delft School of historical morphological analysis is applied to the two cases. Central to the method is the production of reduction drawings that simplify the map data so as to express formal structure and identify structural elements on which the cities can base their future development, thus both maintaining permanence, or historical continuity, and local identity. The research is design oriented. As contemporary maps are more precise when compared to historical maps, even when these are recent, the series of maps is constructed working backwards in time. As the urban tissue of Detroit exists almost entirely of extensive grids, that are reductive in themselves, a relatively low level of abstraction from the map data is sufficient to disclose the urban formal structure, and the elements of the urban form that are independent of the grids stand out as the other structural elements, referring to different moments in the urban history. The urban form of Wuhan is much more complicated, and more difficult to understand. Thus its analysis demands higher levels of abstraction, and with that a different set of analytical tools: homogeneous areas and secondary connections. The paper intends to show that when the cities’ physical characters differ, different sets of analytical tools are needed, which results in different research outcomes. |
| Key words: mapping Delft morphological approach Detroit Wuhan reduction drawing homogeneous area secondary connection |
